Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Yea, having some things in our system be non-transactional is odd and > > hard to understand. ?Just thinking about it, it seems it would introduce > > all sorts of odd behaviors. > > I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even > for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but > not an insurmountable one, I think.
Yea, it is going to feel like a ship with a leaky hull, so we are going to have to re-think a bunch of stuff, like how do we handle visibility, cleanout of old rows from UPDATE, etc. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
