Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > On second thought, since there's no need for a particularly > high-quality RNG here, we could just embed some brain-dead > one-liner implementation, which should behave the same everywhere. Sounds good to me. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
