On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm thinking there isn't anything much we can do here without using a > different message wording for a match to a REJECT entry. So it's a > straight-up tradeoff of possible security information leakage against > whether a different wording is really helpful to the admin. Both of > those seem like fairly marginal concerns, really, so I'm having a hard > time deciding which one ought to win. But given that nobody complained > before this, is it worth changing?
What's wrong with something like "connection not permitted" or "connection not authorized"? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
