Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm not sure how much it would help to increase the statistics > targets, but that would be worth trying. I notice that the scan rowcount estimates are very accurate, there's that one hash join result that's way off, though. What's up with the sort of _accrged7200 (in the slower plan) taking in 3.5 million rows and putting out 1 row? There's something there I'm not understanding. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
