On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 13:17, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex Hunsaker <[email protected]> writes: >> You get a segfault as we try to SvREFCNT_dec(...); > > Hmm. I don't see a segfault on my machine, but I agree that this looks > bogus. I changed it to this order instead: > [ ... ] > so as to keep the "state restore" operations together.
Even better Thanks! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
