Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you think we're at the point where this item is the main thing
>> standing between us and beta, I'll go do something about it. I've
>> been waiting for the HS code to settle before trying to design a
>> solution...
> I'm not hugely interested in supporting HS in standalone backends.
I'm not either. The type of scenario that I'm worried about is someone
trying to use a standalone backend to clean up after a recovery failure.
Right now I'm afraid that could make things worse (ie create additional
corruption).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
