On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: >> With all this fallout, I think it would be cleaner to step back and make >> it a regular GUC variable, not custom. Pretending that plpgsql is >> somehow not an integral part of the system is not completely true >> anyway. Yes, we're playing favorites in the PL camp here, but so what? > > True, but on the other hand, if plpgsql needs this to work nicely, then > $YOURPL probably needs it too.
This thread is still on the open items list, as: Improve behavior of SUSET GUC variables added by loadable modules? Is there something that needs to be done here? If so, what is it? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
