Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 3. Your proposal >>> Treat superuser replication connection like non-superuser one > >> Well, only for this one very specific purpose. I would adjust >> the docs like this: > >> Determines the number of connection "slots" that are reserved for >> connections by PostgreSQL superusers. At most max_connections >> connections can ever be active simultaneously. Whenever the >> number of active concurrent connections is at least >> max_connections minus superuser_reserved_connections, new >> connections will be accepted only for superusers, and no new >> replication connections will be accepted. > >> I think that's pretty simple and clear. > > +1. I'm not sure about the consequences of converting walsender > to non-superuser across the board, and would prefer not to > experiment with it at this stage of the release cycle. +1 -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
