Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> Those confusing things are options and I want them to remain optional,
> not compressed into a potentially too simple model based upon how the
> world looks right now.
What are you arguing is too simple? What *I* think is too simple is
what we have got now, namely a GUC that controls both the availability
of replication connections and the contents of WAL.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
