Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> A design that might work is >> (1) store the active value of wal_mode in pg_control (but NOT as part of >> the last-checkpoint-record image). >> (2) invent a new WAL record type that is transmitted when we change >> wal_mode.
> Well, right now wal_mode would only be able to be changed at server > restart. Right, but slave servers won't find out about the change until the first checkpoint after the start. Which is Too Late. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers