On Apr 24, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> At least AIUI, the use case for this feature is that you want to avoid
>> creating "the same" temporary table over and over again.
> 
> The context that I've seen it come up in is that people don't want to
> clutter their functions with create-it-if-it-doesn't-exist logic,
> which you have to have given the current behavior of temp tables.
> Any performance gain from reduced catalog churn would be gravy.
> 
> Aside from the DROP problem, I think this implementation proposal
> has one other big shortcoming: what are you going to do about
> table statistics?  In many cases, you really *have* to do an ANALYZE
> once you've populated a temp table, if you want to get decent plans
> for it.  Where will you put those stats?

One possibility: rename the existing pg_stats to pg_stats_permanent. Create a 
global temporary table called pg_stats_temporary. pg_stats becomes a union of 
the two. I know the backend wouldn't be able to use the view, but hopefully 
access to statistics goes through a limited set of functions so that teaching 
them about the two different tables isn't hard.

As for cleanup and storage questions; what about having temp objects live in 
pgsql_tmp? I'm thinking create a directory under pgsql_tmp for a backend PID 
the first time it creates a temp object (global or local) and create the files 
in there. That also means that we don't have to come up with different 
relfilenodes for each backend. On the other hand, some layer (presumably smgr) 
would need to understand whether a relation was temporary or not. If we do 
that, cleanup is easy: you can remove any directories that no longer have a 
running PID. For forensics you probably only want to do that automatically when 
a backend starts and discovers it already has a directory, though we should 
also provide an administrator function that will clobber all directories that 
no longer have backends.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to