Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR? > > No. CP949 is not plain EUC-KR, but EUC-KR with some extensions (UHC). At > least on CVS HEAD, we recognize CP949 as an alias for the PostgreSQL > PG_UHC encoding.
That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too. Index: src/port/chklocale.c =================================================================== --- src/port/chklocale.c (HEAD) +++ src/port/chklocale.c (fixed) @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ {PG_GBK, "CP936"}, {PG_UHC, "UHC"}, + {PG_UHC, "CP949"}, {PG_JOHAB, "JOHAB"}, {PG_JOHAB, "CP1361"}, Except UHC, we don't have any codepage aliases for the encodings below. I assume we don't need to add CPxxx because Windows does not have corresponding codepages for them, right? {PG_LATIN6, "ISO-8859-10"}, {PG_LATIN7, "ISO-8859-13"}, {PG_LATIN8, "ISO-8859-14"}, {PG_LATIN10, "ISO-8859-16"}, {PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004, "SJIS_2004"}, Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers