On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to >>> me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, >>> but >>> that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter >>> of >>> opinion. >> >> I don't see how to have internal commands without having special >> cases >> for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I >> guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, >> though. >> >> I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an >> archive_command… > > Saying "its a kludge" doesn't really address the issue and goes > nowhere > towards fixing it. If we don't like the proposal, fine, then what is > the > alternative solution?
I proposed one upthread. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
