Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> v3 attached
This patch changes KnownAssignedXidsRemove() so that failure to find
the target XID is elog(ERROR) (ie, a PANIC, since this is in the
startup process). However, this comment is still there:
/*
* We can fail to find an xid if the xid came from a subtransaction that
* aborts, though the xid hadn't yet been reported and no WAL records
have
* been written using the subxid. In that case the abort record will
* contain that subxid and we haven't seen it before.
*/
WTF? Either the comment is wrong or this should not be an elog
condition.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
