On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Ok, did that. Here's an updated patch:

> +        During recovery, specifies whether or not you can connect and run
> +        queries to enable <xref linkend="hot-standby">. The default value is
> +        <literal>on</literal>.
> +        This parameter can only be set at server start. It is ignored when
> +        not in standby mode.

In the patch, I was not able to find any change which ignores
recovery_connections when standby_mode is OFF.

And that change spoils the combination of pg_standby and HS?
We drop the support for it?


> * renamed wal_mode to wal_level

We should replace "mode" with "level" in the document of wal_level
parameter as follows?

@@ -1368,9 +1368,9 @@ SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
         read-only queries on a standby server.
         This parameter can only be set at server start.
        </para>
        <para>
-        In <literal>minimal</> mode, WAL-logging of some bulk operations, like
+        In <literal>minimal</> level, WAL-logging of some bulk operations, like
         <command>CREATE INDEX</>, <command>CLUSTER</> and <command>COPY</> on
         a table that was created or truncated in the same transaction can be
         safely skipped, which can make those operations much faster (see
         <xref linkend="populate-pitr">). But minimal WAL does not contain
@@ -1379,15 +1379,15 @@ SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
         WAL archiving (<xref linkend="guc-archive-mode">) and streaming
         replication.
        </para>
        <para>
-        In <literal>hot_standby</> mode, the same information is logged as
-        in <literal>archive</> mode, plus information needed to reconstruct
+        In <literal>hot_standby</> level, the same information is logged as
+        in <literal>archive</> level, plus information needed to reconstruct
         the status of running transactions from the WAL. To enable read-only
         queries on a standby server, <varname>wal_level</> must be set to
         <literal>hot_standby</> on the primary. It is thought that there is
         little measurable difference in performance from using
-        <literal>hot_standby</> mode over <literal>archive</>, so feedback
+        <literal>hot_standby</> level over <literal>archive</>, so feedback
         is welcome if any production impacts are noticeable.
        </para>
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to