Simon Riggs wrote: > Doesn't this new behaviour prevent startup-from-a-shutdown-checkpoint?
No. >>>> * wal_level doesn't explicitly describe that the levels are in sequence >>>> and that hot_standby is a superset of archive. >> It does say: >> "The default value is <literal>minimal</>, which writes only the >> information needed to recover from a crash or immediate shutdown. >> <literal>archive</> adds logging required for WAL archiving, and >> <literal>hot_standby</> further adds information required to run >> read-only queries on a standby server." >> >> Want to propose a better wording? > > "so at least archive level" > > changed to > > "so a setting of either archive or hot_standby" > > That way there is no concept of an ordering required to understand the > sentence because it is explicit. Ok, changed along those lines. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
