On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > There hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in weeks, so not really > > sure how you arrive at that the idea the code needs "stabilising". > > Simon, if you don't think the code needs stabilizing, you need to think > again.
This list is entirely new to me. I can't fix problems you haven't even raised before, can I? Why have you been saving that list?? No way are these "known problems". > That's just what I found in a day or so of code reading, and I haven't > read anything like all of the HS patches. You need to stop thinking > about adding features and start thinking about making what's in there > bulletproof. If you happen to have an idle moment when you're not > fixing known problems, re-read some code. Nobody is adding new features. Stop barracking me for something that's not even happening, especially if you persuade yourself you should be angry about it. I care as much about beta as anyone else. Yes, I'll go read your list. Thank you for your review. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
