Jesper Krogh wrote: > On 2010-05-03 23:09, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > > > >> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Dimitri Fontaine<dfonta...@hi-media.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Now you tell me how awful this idea really is :) > >>> > >> I'm not sure I can count that high. :-) > >> > > While I can't improve on Robert's reply, I can supply a PDF about how > > pg_migrator works: > > > > http://momjian.us/main/presentations/technical.html#pg_migrator > > > > > There is a huge amount of users to whom pg_migrator is "at least" > a big a feature as HS+SR is. > > Last dump/restore was a 24 hours process in one of our installations. > I think it was due to in-efficiency in handling BYTEA types in the > process (but not sure). > > But I'm one of the few guys who seem to have an infinite amount of > time for reading on mailing lists, but without my knowledge from > reading this list I would never have run pg_migrator on my production > data if I had to pick it from pg_foundry.
So, did you use "copy" or "link" mode, and how fast was the pg_migrator upgrade? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
