Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Uh, did we decide that 'wal_keep_segments' was the best name for this > GUC setting? I know we shipped beta1 using that name.
I thought min_wal_segments was a reasonable proposal, but it wasn't
clear if there was consensus or not.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
