Robert Haas wrote: > Wultsch (who doesn't ever want to kill queries and therefore would be > happy with a boolean), Yeb Havinga (who never wants to stall recovery > and therefore would also be happy with a boolean), and Florian Pflug > (who points out that pause/resume is actually a nontrivial feature). > Apologies if I've left anyone out or misrepresented their position. > > Overall I would say opinion is about evenly split between: > > - leave it as-is > - make it a Boolean > - change it in some way but to something more expressive than a Boolean > > I can't presume to extract a consensus from that; I don't think there > is one. You could say "the majority of people want to change > something" and that would be true; you could also say "the majority of > people don't want a Boolean" and that would also be true.
Yep, this is where we are. Discussion had stopped, so it seemed like time for a decision, and with no one agreeing on what to do, feature removal seemed like the best approach. Suggesting we will fix it later in beta is not a solution. Now, if everyone agrees we should do X, and X in simple, lets do X, but I am stil not seeing that. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
