On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:01 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I already explained that killing the startup process first is a bad idea > > for many reasons when shutdown was discussed. Can't remember who added > > the new standby shutdown code recently, but it sounds like their design > > was pretty poor if it didn't include shutting down properly with HS. I > > hope they fix the bug they have introduced. HS was never designed to > > work that way, so there is no flaw there; it certainly worked when > > committed. > > New smart shutdown during recovery doesn't kill the startup process until > all of the read only backends have gone away. So it works fine with HS.
Yes, I thought some more about what Robert said. HS works identically to normal running in this regard, so there's no hint of a bug or design flaw on that for either of us to worry about. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
