On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 09:37 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > The server's messages and the documentation uses all of these terms in > > mixed ways. Maybe we could decide on some preferred terminology and > > adjust the existing texts. Ideas? > > How about origin/subscriber? More descriptive than primary/secondary, > and less tied to a particular model of interaction.
Yes but completely out of scope within the market. Master/Slave or Master/Standby is probably where it needs to be. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
