Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> momj...@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes: > >>> Add PGAPPICON to all executable makefiles. > >> > >> Is it really a good idea to have done that to the server, in particular? > >> I can't imagine it being a good idea to launch the postmaster from a > >> GUI, which is what I suppose this is good for. > > > Well, I assume this was the "icon", which I assumed should match for all > > the binaries, as compared to config files, for example. > > Er... why are you committing undiscussed patches if you just "assume" > they will work, or indeed do anything useful at all? You should not > have touched this if you don't know exactly what it will do and why > changing it is a good thing.
All other binaries had such a designation, and all /contrib binaries were missing them. I assume I was doing cleanup. You want the icon removed from the backend makefile? I can easily do it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
