Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Jessica Perry Hekman wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Barry Lind wrote: > > > > > Since both the JDBC and ODBC specs have essentially the same symantics > > > for this, I would hope this is done in the backend instead of both > > > interfaces. > > > > The current plan seems to be to make changes in the backend and the JDBC > > interface, the bulk of the implementation being in the backend. > > Yes, ODBC and JDBC need this, and I am sure psql folks will use it too, > not counting libpq and all the others.
I wasn't able to follow this thread sorry. ODBC has QUERY_TIMEOUT and CONNECTION_TIMEOUT. > We just need a way to specify statement-level SET options inside a > transaction where the statement may fail and ignore the SET command that > resets the timeout. We don't have any mechanism to reset the timeout > parameter at the end of a transaction automatically, Why should the timeout be reset automatically ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
