bruce wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > All other binaries had such a designation, and all /contrib binaries > > > were missing them. I assume I was doing cleanup. You want the icon > > > removed from the backend makefile? > > > > Yes. I'm prepared to believe that not having the icons set on the > > contrib executables was an oversight. I'm much less prepared to assume > > that not marking the postgres executable was an oversight. Again, > > unless you *know* that this change is needed and appropriate, now is > > not the time to be making it, and especially not without discussion. > > OK, done with attached patch, and I added a comment about why it is not > labeled.
I did some research on PGFILEDESC and it does what I thought it does --- in embeds the 'ico' file into the executable in /pg/tools/msvc/Project.pm, and the image looks like the attached JPEG. The image is of a blue elephant head. So, currently, every binary uses that icon, except for the postmaster. Is that what we want? You could make the argument that a daemon, like the postmaster, shouldn't have one, which I think is Tom's point. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
<<inline: /rtmp/mime.9550/win32.jpg>>
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
