On Thu, 13 May 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scra...@hub.org> wrote:
My thought had been a split along the lines of major components of the server
... for instance, a totally seperate list for HS related issues, so that, if
nothing else, those 'lurkers' that are only interested in developments on that
front could be there but not on the main stream -hackers ... almost like
seperate working groups ...
We tried that with pgsql-hackers-win32 and iirc also
pgsql-hackers-pitr, and it was a big failure...
But, we are doing that now with pgsql-cluster-hackers and it looks to be
working quite well from what I can see ... guess it depends on if ppl want
it to fail in the first place or not *shrug*
It also depends if a clear line can be drawn and adhered to ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scra...@hub.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
