On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > BTW, What I'd like to see as a very first patch first is to change the > current poll loops in walreceiver and walsender to, well, not poll. > That's a requirement for synchronous replication, is very useful on its > own, and requires a some design and implementation effort to get right. > It would be nice to get that out of the way before/during we discuss the > more user-visible behavior.
Yeah, we should wake up the walesender from sleep to send WAL data as soon as it's flushed. But why do we need to change the loop of walreceiver? Or you mean changing the poll loop in the startup process? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
