Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I suppose it's a judgment call which is uglier.  Thoughts?
> 

Well, PUBLIC is an SQL reserved keyword (pre-92).  We are
already very liberal with keywords. I would leave PUBLIC alone.

I does not _have_ to be "public", so we can just avoid the issue
by adding a pg_ prefix to public, common or something else. 
It is a PostgreSQL concept anyway.   

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to