On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 01:02 +0300, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 5/21/10 11:47 PM +0300, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > It also allows you to enforce the constraint that only one tuple exists
> > in a table by doing something like:
> >
> > create table a
> > (
> > i int,
> > exclude using gist (i with<>),
> > unique (i)
> > );
>
> FWIW, this is achievable a lot more easily:
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "a_single_row" ON a ((1));
>
Yes, you're right. Also, neither of us accounted for NULLs, so I suppose
a NOT NULL is necessary as well.
I think the original case (same values only) is potentially useful
enough that we should support it.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
