On tis, 2010-05-25 at 06:23 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Of course, if people want to suggest tests that just shouldn't be > > > included, I can go through and strip things out. > > > > Well... I'm a little reluctant to believe that we should have 3.3M of > > tests for the entire backend and 5M of tests just for psql. Then, > > too, there's the fact that many of these tests fail on my machine > > because my username is not sfrost, and/or because of row-ordering > > differences on backslash commands without enough ORDER BY to fully > > determine the output order. > > Yeah, you know, I had fully intended to go grepping through the output > last night to check for things like that, but my wife decided I needed > sleep instead. :) Sorry about that. Still, it's more of a general > proposal than something I think should be committed as-is. Should we > try to deal with those kinds of differences, or just eliminate the tests > which are dependent on username, etc? It definitely strikes me that > there's a fair bit of code in psql we're not exercising in some fashion > in the regression suite... :/
Maybe pg_regress is not the right framework to test that sort of thing. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
