On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > There already is a first patch to the community that implements quorum > commit, just not by you.
Yeah, AFAIK, that patch includes also per-standby setting. > If you have a better way, describe it in detail and in full now, with > reference to each of the use cases you mentioned, so that people get a > chance to give their opinions on your design. Then we can let the > community decide whether or not that second way is actually better. We > may not need a second patch. See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01407.php But I think that we should focus on "per-standby" setting at first. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
