> > It's not a practical solution for people working with prebuilt Postgres
> > versions, which is most people.  I don't object to finding a way to
> > provide a "not-space" behavior instead of an "is-alnum" behavior,
> > but as noted upthread a GUC isn't the right way.  How do you feel
> > about a new set of functions with an additional flag argument of
> > some sort?
> 
> Let me see how many functions we need to create...

After thinking a little bit more, I think following patch would not
break existing behavior and also adopts mutibyte + C locale case. What
do you think?

*** trgm_op.c~  2009-06-11 23:48:51.000000000 +0900
--- trgm_op.c   2010-05-29 17:07:28.000000000 +0900
***************
*** 59,65 ****
  }
  
  #ifdef KEEPONLYALNUM
! #define iswordchr(c)  (t_isalpha(c) || t_isdigit(c))
  #else
  #define iswordchr(c)  (!t_isspace(c))
  #endif
--- 59,67 ----
  }
  
  #ifdef KEEPONLYALNUM
! #define iswordchr(c)  (lc_ctype_is_c()? \
!                                                               ((*(c) & 0x80)? 
!t_isspace(c) : (t_isalpha(c) || t_isdigit(c))) : \
!                                                               (t_isalpha(c) 
|| t_isdigit(c)))
  #else
  #define iswordchr(c)  (!t_isspace(c))
  #endif

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to