=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulc...@wulczer.org> writes:
> [ e of ] s/2 or s/3 look reasonable.
The examples in the LC paper seem to all use e = s/10. Note the stated
assumption e << s.
> So, should I just write a patch that sets the bucket width and pruning
> count using 0.07 as the assumed frequency of the most common word and
> epsilon equal to s/2 or s/3?
I'd go with s = 0.07 / desired-MCE-count and e = s / 10, at least for
a first cut to experiment with.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
