> > > This is in 9.0, because 8.4 doesn't recognize the \u escape syntax. If > > > you run this in 8.4, you're just comparing a sequence of ASCII letters > > > and digits. > > > > Hum. Still I prefer 8.4's behavior since anything is better than > > returning NaN. It seems 9.0 does not have any escape route for > > multibyte+C locale users. > > I think you are confusing some things here. The \u escape syntax is for > string literals in general. The behavior of pg_trgm is still the same > in 8.4 and in 9.0. It's just easier in 9.0 to write out examples > relevant to the current problem.
I just wanted to point out from the point of view of users. I do not object the new \u escape syntax. I think pg_trgm has a problem. But Tom thinks that it's not a problem. That's the point. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers