Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, but if we are going to have to honor "=>" eventually, shouldn't we > just do it now? Supporting := and => seems confusing.
Personally, I haven't accepted the "if" part of that, therefore I
feel no need to argue over the "then".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
