Bruce Momjian wrote:
MSSQL? Are you sure? This is the example posted in this thread:
EXEC dbo.GetItemPrice @ItemCode = 'GXKP', @PriceLevel = 5
and it more matches our := syntax than => in its argument ordering.
I think you are seriously confused, or else you are seriously confusing
me. The => proposal is to have the ordering "param_name =>
passed_value", just as Oracle has, just as MSSQL has "@param_name =
passed_value", and just as the := proposal would have "param_name :=
passed_value".
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
