> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tom Lane > > > > > > Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Could we get out of this by defining that "timeout" is > > > > automatically reset at next statement end? > > > > > > I was hoping to avoid that, because it seems like a wart. OTOH, > > > it'd be less of a wart than the global changes of semantics that > > > Bruce is proposing :-( > > > > Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread. > > Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ? > > What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout > > command just before every query ? > > You could do that, but we also imagine cases where people would want to > set a timeout for each query in an entire session.
Sorry I couldn't understand your point. It seems the simplest and the most certain way is to call 'SET QUERY_TIMEOUT per query. The way dosen't require RESET at all. Is the overhead an issue ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
