Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > The proposal some time back in this thread was to trust all built-in > functions and no others. That's a bit simplistic, no doubt, but it > seems to me to largely solve the performance problem and to do so with > minimal effort. When and if you get to a solution that's committable > with respect to everything else, it might be time to think about > more flexible answers to that particular point.
What about trusting all "internal" and "C" language function instead? My understanding is that "internal" covers built-in functions, and as you need to be a superuser to CREATE a "C" language function, surely you're able to accept that by doing so you get to trust it? How useful would that be? -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
