On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 11:34 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > ... > > Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. > ... > > A lack of bugs usually indicates there are no bugs in the areas being > > tested. > > Would the real Simon Riggs please speak up?
LOL, its me, flaws included. > Isn't that precisely what > "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is meant to refute? You snipped out the part where I give other possible explanations also, so the two statements above do not counterpoise each other of themselves in my original text. I stand by my whole statement, as intended. Now, I think I misread Tom's comments. I agree with Tom that the new bug discovery rate has fallen to zero and that probably indicates that no new/ground-breaking tests are taking place. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers