Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote:
>> So there's no way to see if a particular privilege has been granted to
>> public. ISTM 'public' should be accepted, since you can't use it as a role
>> name anyway...
> It's a bit sticky - you could make that work for
> has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) or has_table_privilege(name,
> text, text), but what would you do about the versions whose first
> argument is an oid?
Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against
pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
