Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
>> max_locks_per_xact != max_locks_per_xact)
>> 
>> Looks like a bug.

> Ah, it should be compared with the same name field in ControlFile.

Yeah, obvious typo, please commit.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to