Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> max_locks_per_xact != max_locks_per_xact) >> >> Looks like a bug.
> Ah, it should be compared with the same name field in ControlFile. Yeah, obvious typo, please commit. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers