On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> How about no operator at all? It won't be as cool to read, but >> consider, the arguments are text and text, not involving any hstore type >> at all, so whatever operator you choose is in practice blocked from >> everyone everywhere. No one could ever implement another key/value >> system that uses a similar interface. Or use the operator for anything >> else involving strings. > > Yeah, that's a good point. Maybe we should just deprecate the operator > altogether.
That would make it so that the use of => in hstore strings would be less consistent. Makes sense to me. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
