Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > > > Why should the SET query_timeout = 0 command be issued > > > > > only when the query failed ? Is it a JDBC driver's requirement > > > > > or some applications' requirements which uses the JDBC driver ? > > > > > > > > They want the timeout for only the one statement, so they have to set it > > > > to non-zero before the statement, and to zero after the statement. > > > > > > Does setQueryTimeout() issue a corresponding SET QUERY_TIMEOUT > > > command immediately in the scenario ? > > > > Yes. If we don't make the SET rollback-able, we have to do all sorts of > > tricks in jdbc so aborted transactions get the proper SET value. > > In my scenario, setQueryTimeout() only saves the timeout > value and issues the corrsponding SET QUERY_TIMEOUT command > immediately before each query if necessary.
Yes, we can do that, but it requires an interface like odbc or jdbc. It is hard to use for libpq or psql. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
