Robert Haas wrote: > In response to a complaint from Hartmut Goebel: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00018.php > > And per a design proposed by Tom Lane: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00211.php > > PFA a patch to implement $SUBJECT. One interesting aspect of this > patch is that types like "integer" and "double precision" don't get > quoted in the output, whereas types like "text" do. But it turns out > that types like "integer" and "double precision" don't *work* if > they're quoted, so this is not a bad thing. It might possibly be > judged to require documentation somewhere, however.
Uh, I thought this was about quoting the identifiers. I am confused about why "integer" is an issue in this case. Can you show an example? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
