2010/6/14 KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: > I attached three patches for the effort. > Each patch tries to tackle one theme, so it is not unreasonable. > > But the ESP security hook patch (quite tiny) depends on the DML permission > refactoring patch (relatively larger). So, Robert suggested me to reconsider > the dependency of these patches. > > The attached patch shall be applied on the head of the git repository. > It just adds a security hook on ExecCheckRTPerms() as Robert suggested > at first. > Of course, it does not allow to acquire the control on COPY TO/FROM and > RI_Initial_Check(). It will be refactored in the following patches.
This is essentially the same patch that I wrote and posted several weeks ago, with changes to the comments and renaming of the identifiers. Are you trying to represent it as your own work? With all due respect, I intend to imply my own version. Please make your other proposed patches apply on top of that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
