(2010/06/17 21:59), Robert Haas wrote: > 2010/6/17 KaiGai Kohei<kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: >> I tried to implement a modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept, using the DML >> permission check hook which was proposed by Robert Haas. >> >> At first, please build and install the latest PostgreSQL with this >> patch to add a hook on DML permission checks. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01095.php >> >> Then, check out the modular se-pgsql, as follows: >> % svn co http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ sepgsql > > This is a good start - I think with some cleanup this could be > committable, though probably it makes sense to wait until after we get > the security label infrastructure in. I suspect some code cleanup > will be needed; one thing I noticed off the top of my head was that > you didn't follow the usual style for installing hook functions in a > way that can accomodate multiple hooks. See contrib/auto_explain for > an example. > Thanks for your comments. I'll fix it later.
BTW, I have a question which community (PostgreSQL or SELinux) shall eventually maintain the module, although PostgreSQL provides a set of interfaces for access control modules? I thought SELinux side (mainly I and NEC) will maintain the sepgsql module being suitable for the interfaces. If we need another proof-of-concept module independent from selinux for regression test, at least, it is not a tough work. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers