On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Here's an attempt at rewording the sections so that the >>> information is included in each parameter's description without >>> taking up a whole sentence. >>> >>> Thoughts? > >> It makes the point without beating one over the head with it. I >> particularly like the way this patch moves the main point of the >> parameter to the front, with all the conditions under which it might >> be ignored pushed farther back. It reads much better that way, at >> least for me. > > Looks good to me too.
OK, committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
