Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> You could argue it either way. The number of beta testers with
>>> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
>>> just changing the code without a catversion bump. OTOH, if we want to
>>> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
>>
>> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.
> And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3. :-) Most fixes were related
> to platform compile portability.
Well, if you think that pg_upgrade has changed materially since beta2,
that would be a good argument for getting some fresh testing for it,
which in turn argues for doing the catversion bump here.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
