Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Josh Berkus wrote: >>> You could argue it either way. The number of beta testers with >>> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to >>> just changing the code without a catversion bump. OTOH, if we want to >>> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ... >> >> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.
> And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3. :-) Most fixes were related > to platform compile portability. Well, if you think that pg_upgrade has changed materially since beta2, that would be a good argument for getting some fresh testing for it, which in turn argues for doing the catversion bump here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers