Le 30/06/2010 05:25, Tom Lane a écrit : > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> So this is not something we want fixed for 9.0, as indicated by Simon? >>> I don't see the patch on the commit-fest page yet. > >> I tend to think we should fix it for 9.0, but could be talked out of >> it if someone has a compelling argument to make. > > Er, maybe I lost count, but I thought you were the one objecting to > the patch. >
You're right. Robert questioned the use of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in code available in the src/port directory. I don't see what issue could result with this. He also said that whatever would be commited should be back-patched. I can still add it for the next commit fest, I just don't want this patch to get lost. Though I won't be able to do this before getting back from work. Thanks. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
