Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 06 22:31:40 -0400 2010:
>>> Hmm... so, maybe ShareUpdateExclusiveLock?
>>
>> So COMMENT ON will conflict with (auto)vacuum? Seems a bit weird ...
> Well, I'm open to suggestions... I doubt we want to create a new lock
> level just for this.
[ shrug... ] COMMENT ON is DDL, and most forms of DDL will conflict
with vacuum. I can't get excited about that complaint.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
